Pontification

zombieman's picture

I’ve been known to go off on politics now and again. At least I don’t sit back and mutter, ‘They’re a bunch of damned fools!’ or ‘If I ran things, they would work!’ Er, okay I do say those things. What you might not know is that I’ve been edu-ma-cating myself on how the politics work here in the good ole U S of A. Really I am amazed they work at all.

First and foremost let me say I am not happy with any of the ‘labels’ that are attached to our politics. Republican, Democrat, Anarchist, Green, Liberal, Tory, Libertarian…these are all just divisive terms used to exclude the shunned, un-washable masses from one group or another. I would say, within reason most people fall within all the political spectrums at some point in their life. Right now, I am a card carrying member of the Republican Party…don’t yell ‘yay!’ or throw stones at me just yet...

I have been a very strong proponent of Libertarianism for the past decade or more, if anything I would classify myself as a libertarian with socialist tendencies. I value personal freedom and privacy quite highly. I think the government CAN take care of some of the burdens on things we all need, like education, the military and, gasp, health care. On the other hand I dislike government intrusion. Every time I get patted down at the airport or have my privacy invaded by the government (ironically through something called the ‘Patriot Act’) my blood boils in rage. We have come so far away from what the founders wanted and, more importantly from what ‘We, the People’ want and expect that I can’t even imagine a way to bring civility and discussion back into the ring. A quote from one of my favorite movies goes, “The God damn plane has crashed into the mountain!”

Anyway, back on track here… I like Ron Paul, he is campaigning on the Republican Ticket, so, to help out, that’s where I am at. Last week I went up to the Republican District Convention, where we all got to vote on the district planks (beliefs) and nominate and elect committee members. Ron Paul’s supporters were well organized, or duped; every seat on the committees was taken by an alleged supporter of his. Next we go to state and from there to the federal convention. This is all very interesting, but what is my point? The point, for me, is people. Yep, that simple. You can’t take dumbasses out of the picture and no matter how many times they are nominated or screened, ignorance wins the day.

No surprise here, but this cycle the ‘big thing’ is smaller government, fiscal responsibility and more freedom. How do we get these things? By passing laws! When do we want them? Next election! Seriously, every law we pass requires MORE government intervention, not less. Every law we pass requires more money to enforce, not less. The freedom thing is up for debate, but I have long said that we, the people, traded our freedoms for ‘rights’ a long time ago. Don’t think there’s a difference? Right to be free, that’s one of our guarantees, after all isn’t it? Freedom is an expressed ability to not be interference with by rules or regulations; rights define what you can and cannot do. I suppose the ‘right’ to be free is fine, so long as you agree with someone else’s definition of your ‘right’, I’d rather follow my own definition of ‘free’, thank you very much.

So, I know what you’re thinking (or may be thinking) ‘Mark wants Anarchy!’ Hold off on calling Homeland Security on me just yet. I think there are a set of common things we can agree upon. Like “I’d really like not being killed by someone.” or “It’d sure be great not to be raped tonight!” or even “Gosh! I hope my house wasn’t burglarized again!” These sorts of things would seem to be common sense, enforceable and agreed upon by *most*, but surprisingly these sorts of things are gray areas too.

When does life begin? At what point do we protect it? Six months before birth? Or maybe six months after birth? (“Well we gave it a shot, but this whole ‘baby’ thing isn’t for us.”) At what age and in what situations can consent to sexual liaisons be freely given? We regulate the age people can legally have sex. Think about that for a moment. If either party is under that magical age the older person is raping the younger one. Sorry, I don’t have a gray area for burglary; feel free to chime in if you can think of one. This is politics.

Another, laughable, debate is ‘Gay Marriage’. The plane has already crashed into the goddamned mountain fiscally and people are worried about two dudes or chicks starting a family together? Fuck me. Or the official Republican take on capital punishment; life is sacred…except if you kill someone else. ‘Cause, like that’s what the Bible says and all. It does say to execute our unruly children, no mention of what to do to murders, not directly, so I assume we give them cookies and send them on their way with a strong admonishment to go forth and do evil no more. Don’t get me wrong, I like capital punishment, I just don’t think it belongs in the Republican platform, maybe they could trade that plank out with the Democrats? What? The Dems don’t want it either? And someone has to take it? Can’t we give it to the National Socialist party?

Should we go into religion a bit more? Oh, why not, in for a penny, in for a dollar, I always say. So, with both feet, what the hell is wrong with people? The Constitution of our great land says ‘Separation of Church and State.’ Pretty Goddamned clear, yet we open each convention with a nice all-excluding Christian prayer and candidates mention the holy biscuit or son or whatever, whenever they think it will give them political advantage. We had an hour long debate on whether to ‘Adjourn’ or ‘Recess’ our convention. I shit you not. At this point I leaned forward and asked the Governor of Iowa (Yeah, he’s from my county and I spoke with him, look at me traveling in such august circles!) if it was always like this and he told me this was a first, usually the problems came during the ‘planking’ in the afternoon.  It was still before 11:00 am at this point. Our prayer should have been for speedy resolution of annoying verbiage in the party convention handout. 

Back to religion. I don’t have any, I don’t want any. I ESPECIALLY don’t want any in my government, nor in my government officials. If any of them have religious leanings I hope they can keep them in their pants while they serve people who might not share their particular beliefs. This year that excludes most of the candidates already.

Look, if you don’t believe babies should be aborted, don’t abort your babies. Your heathen slut of a neighbor will get hers/his when they meet the angels at the gate who will cast them down into hell. Am I right? Don’t like gay sex, don’t have any. Don’t like women voting? Marry one who doesn’t or don’t vote (depending on your gender). Don’t want to work on the Sabbath, don’t. Want to kill your kid because he’s disobedient and your religion says you can? Whoa there Nelly! Let’s rein this in. See how easy it is to get your religion in my politics? Religion should not be used as a justification to break the rules of religion. Yeah, yeah, there is a new testament and all, I should stop quoting the three thousand year old book and start quoting the one that’s only two thousand years old, it’s nicer and all. Still where does ‘freedom of religion’ end and government totalitarianism begin?

The quirky thing here is that I’ve learned some things and not all of them are cynical or bad. The crazies are out there, but follow the logic of laws down to their fuzzy little cores and you will find places where a decision on right and wrong needs to be made. I wish I still thought that division was a solid, definable thing, but I know it’s not and never will be. Things are easier when you don’t think about them, eh? Yeah I gave up a Saturday that I could have used to write about Zombies and I’ll be giving up more time at the State Convention in June too, but self-edification is a worthy goal most people can agree with and I intend on riding this horse as far as it will take me. 

4 comments

by blazinerday on Tue, 05/01/2012 - 01:43

iv got a good grey area. our country no longer believes in innocent till proven guilty. i recently had an incident at my house. a neigbor had an argument with my wife and before she knew was surounded by 5 people. 2 women and 3 men. they came onto my lawn threatening my wife. i defended her by grabing my toolbag( i had been working on my car) and shaking it and telling them i would stabem with a scewdriver if they touched my wife. they left and called the cops. i was arrested for menacing and when i got to see the judge he didnt even read my side of the story, or ask my anything he just put bail at double what a first time offender would get. nowadays you cant even protect your family on your own property. as for burglery. many cases have prosecuted home owners who shoot a burgler. i read a case were a father found a burgler in his kids room and shot him. he was facing charges for manslaughter.

zombieman's picture

by zombieman on Tue, 05/01/2012 - 20:59

As is this: http://www.businessinsider.com/marissa-danielle-alexander-2012-5She is up for 20 years for firing a warning shot to keep her husband from abusing her and letting her get away. Crap like this stuff makes my blood boil.I don't see those as 'gray' though, pretty clearly you shouldn't have been charged and Marissa shouldn't have either.  Not sure who to blame for this exactly, the liberal left? I don't think so. The 'put everyone in prison' right? Not 100% their fault either. Or maybe I'm wrong just for thinking of trying to FIND someone to blame?

by blazinerday on Tue, 05/01/2012 - 22:28

its no big secret that we have countys and cities in america that dont have a decent legal system. there are many places where innocent till proven guilty doesnt apply. some of  these areas operate on prejudice and an overzelous approach to law and order. after readin the article in the link you provided i think i need a cigar.  i question why are we allowed to bear arms but not use them for self defense. our government is butchering the constitution and making it harder to get a "legal" gun and then making it illegeal to use it. somehow i dont believe our founding fathers had hunting in mind when they included the right to bear  arms.as i write this im getting a message from nortons to renew my membership and i ask "if the government can regulate the internet and stop people commiting copy right  infringement then why dont they protect the internet"? why do i pay for internet security?isnt hacking illegal?by paying nortons to handle the hackers im paying a non law enforcement agency to handle criminals. isnt that taking the law into my own hands? i pay taxes and dont have to pay a seperate police bill. maybe some might say its not theyre job, but i believe if you can look out for the corporation then you can look out for your voters. and if its not theyre job they should leave the internet completely alone. but the money they get behind closed doors from corporations is to good. so they take the stance of helping the corporations and forgeting about voters. i believe all public servants should serve the general public and politicians are most responsible for looking out for the average man. so when i see something like this i blame them all.

zombieman's picture

by zombieman on Wed, 05/02/2012 - 20:12

Law enforcement is such a mish-mash, on the one hand I believe in a locally controlled police force and local rules and regulations, on the other that can lead to wildly different legal problems. So abolish the states and move to a single 'Federal' system? No good answers here.

I do believe our government has sold out to the corporations, we're drifting towards a plutocracy, as can be evidenced by the fact that now corporations can give virtually unlimited funds through PACs to get corporation-friendly officials elected. It is just a matter of time before some corporation decides 'buying' the election is in their best interest, then buying elections for the house and senate to suppor their first investment. Probably it will work the other way, but who knows? It would only take a major computer or oil company to do it, or perhaps an alliance of companies working together?

Or perhaps I'm being too cynical tonight? I've been working long days this week and getting shorted on sleep so maybe I'm not thinking as 'optimistically' as I should be.

 

 

Post new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
© 2011-2014 Ctales Publishing. Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.